ML618712861
Contributor
Date
Location
- Age
- Not specified
- Sex
- Not specified
Observation details
rare, especially in the spring for both state and county. feel pretty good about identification and elimination of Pacific Golden-Plover. I'm unsure of age and plumage so I focused on structural features. fieldmarks in favor of AMGP compared to PGPL: - relatively small slim bill - primary projection beyond tail long - either equal or almost as long as bill length - bird didn't come out of the grass but leg length didn't seem notably long bird was hanging out on the close grassy area directly west of where I viewed from behind the fence, in the picnic area next to main building. bird didn't move very far but would disappear from view once in a while by going further into the ditch. bird didn't vocalize. === Notes below added 5/9 === I contacted Oscar W. Johnson, PhD of Montana State University (he coauthored this great paper about golden plover morphometric features) and he had this to say about this bird: "Looks to me like a longish primary projection consistent with American Golden-Plover. Also, overall coloration (though photos could be misleading) appears less colorful than Pacific GP, again consistent with AMGP. Very likely a female given the plumage as of the date (a male would be more colorful by 5/8), and this could be her full breeding plumage. There's lots of variation among females (both species), some almost male-like, others quite drab like your photos."
Technical information
- Model
- Pixel 4a
- Lens
- Pixel 4a back camera 4.38mm f/1.73
- ISO
- 79
- Focal length
- 4.4 mm
- Flash
- Flash did not fire
- f-stop
- f/1.7
- Shutter speed
- 8351/1000000 sec
- Dimensions
- 1498 pixels x 1497 pixels
- Original file size
- 244.41 KB